It鈥檚 the black and blue (or gold and white) dress phenomenon all over again, except this time it鈥檚 a test for your ears, not your eyes. What started as a post on social news site Reddit has made its way around social media and into the mainstream media, perplexing even the news anchors. Watch the video clip below: 鈥淟aurel鈥 or 鈥淵anny鈥濃攚hat do you hear?
Do you hear "Yanny" or "Laurel?"
We stopped by the office of 抖阴短视频 Sound Design professor Jason Romney, who broke down the recording for us and shed some light on the phenomenon that鈥檚 taking the internet by storm.
鈥淚t鈥檚 a poor recording to begin with,鈥 says Romney. When sound is converted into a digital format, information is removed in order to make the file smaller. During file compression, content is eliminated that isn鈥檛 needed in order to understand. The extent to which information is removed depends on what format the file is presented in.
The viral recording has now been shared and re-shared thousands of times in a variety of formats. Each time the file is altered, it lessens in quality鈥攎aking a clear distinction between 鈥渓aurel鈥 and 鈥測anny鈥 that much more difficult to recognize.
鈥淥ur brain is really good at filling in gaps, and it does so based on previous experience,鈥 explains Romney. He likens it to hearing a live performance:
If you鈥檝e ever heard a clarinet in person, you remember that sound. Later, you may hear a poorly encoded recording of a clarinet. You already know what a clarinet sounds like from hearing it live before, so you have enough clues based on your past experience to be able to hear a similar sound.
In short, human hearing is nonlinear and we are more likely to hear things that we鈥檙e already familiar with. .
鈥淚t probably wouldn鈥檛 have worked as well if the words hadn鈥檛 been written for you,鈥 says Romney. 鈥淚n the original video, you see two words鈥攁nd they鈥檙e in different colors. So whatever your predisposition is to color could help you to make a decision before you even hear the recording.鈥
Romney played the recording for his wife and son without giving them the two word choices in advance. His son heard 鈥渓aurel,鈥 but his wife heard another word entirely: 鈥渏erry.鈥
鈥淲e see this in theatre a lot,鈥 adds Romney. Rain is a common effect for sound engineers working in theatre to create.
鈥淲e could go outside and record it raining right now, but without context if you played that clip on a sunny day it would sound to most people like bacon frying,鈥 explains Romney.
鈥淚n a production, we have to give a visual cue or a sound of thunder before to help the audience to interpret it as rain.鈥
The file started with only one word, says Romney, debunking the theory that it is two words recorded over top of one another. But one word heard at different octaves makes a huge difference. Insert the speech banana:

The Speech Banana, courtesy of clearvaluehearing.com
The speech banana helps to explain where the sounds used in everyday human speech occur on an audiogram. The pitch of these two words is very different. The 鈥渓鈥 in 鈥淟aurel鈥 is around 500 hz and the 鈥測鈥 in 鈥淵anny鈥 is on the diagram closer to 250 hz. There鈥檚 also an entire octave difference between the 鈥渞鈥 sound in 鈥淟aurel鈥 and the 鈥渘鈥 sound in 鈥淵anny.鈥
Romney took an original recording and shifted the pitch up a half octave, then down a half octave. Click to play below. Can you hear the difference?
As your brain fills in the gaps left by compressing the sound, you may lean more towards a lower or higher pitch based on your predisposition to particular sounds. Chances are, if you have a dog named 鈥淵anny,鈥 you鈥檙e never going to hear 鈥淟aurel鈥 on this recording.
However, Romney suspects that 鈥淟aurel鈥 is indeed the intended word, used in the original recording. It鈥檚 all a matter of opinion and previous life experience, though. Case closed until the next internet phenomenon arrives.
May 16, 2018